Cinema (한국 영화): How It Became a World-Class Industry

On March 9, 2020, 봉준호 (Bong Joon-ho) stood at the Academy Awards podium and accepted the Oscar for Best Picture — the first non-English language film ever to win. He thanked the Academy in Korean. The interpreter translated. The room responded with a standing ovation. It was the moment the Western film industry acknowledged something critics and festival programmers had known for decades: Korean cinema was operating at the highest level. It had been, for a long time.

The Beginning: Cinema Under Colonialism (1919–1945)

Korean cinema began in the Japanese colonial period. The first Korean narrative film — 의리적 구투 (Righteous Revenge, 1919) — was released the same year as the 삼일절 (March 1st Independence Movement). From the start, Korean film existed in contested political space: a medium of expression under foreign rule, subject to censorship and ideological pressure.

The colonial period produced a small but meaningful body of work, including 나운규 (Na Un-gyu)'s 아리랑 (Arirang, 1926) — a film so beloved it became a cultural touchstone, though the original print no longer exists. Korean cinema was already developing a tendency toward social and political engagement that would define it for generations.

Division and the Korean War (1945–1960)

The 1945 liberation from Japan and the subsequent division of the peninsula complicated everything. The 한국전쟁 (Korean War, 1950–1953) destroyed much of the existing film infrastructure. Post-war cinema in South Korea emerged from the rubble with a characteristic quality: melodrama with an edge, social observation wrapped in genre conventions.

자유부인 (Madame Freedom, 1956) — about a married woman who enters the workforce and social life — was a cultural flashpoint that drew enormous audiences and controversy. It's an early example of Korean film using genre to engage directly with social change.

The Golden Age (1960s)

The 1960s are considered Korean cinema's first golden age. The industry was prolific — over 200 films per year at peak — and directors like 김기영 (Kim Ki-young) and 신상옥 (Shin Sang-ok) were producing work of genuine ambition.

김기영's 하녀 (The Housemaid, 1960) — about a predatory maid who enters and destabilizes a bourgeois household — is now recognized as a masterwork of Korean cinema: psychologically intense, formally innovative, and deeply uncomfortable in ways that still register. 봉준호 has cited it as a major influence on 기생충 (Parasite).

The golden age ended with increased government censorship under the 박정희 (Park Chung-hee) military regime, which exercised tight control over content for political and ideological reasons.

The Dark Period: Censorship and Constraint (1970s–1980s)

The 1970s and 1980s saw Korean cinema constrained by government censorship that required scripts to be pre-approved, banned certain subjects entirely, and mandated a quota of government-approved "quality films." Genre films — horror, action, erotic melodrama — thrived partly because their low prestige made them less subject to scrutiny.

The 스크린 쿼터 (screen quota system) — requiring Korean cinemas to screen Korean films for a minimum number of days per year — was introduced during this period and became the foundation of the industry's ability to sustain itself against Hollywood competition. It remains a point of periodic political debate.

Tip — The screen quota: Korea's 스크린 쿼터 (currently 73 days per year for domestic films) has been both a protection mechanism and a flashpoint. When the US pressured Korea to reduce it during KORUS FTA negotiations in the 2000s, Korean directors and actors staged significant public protests. The quota is credited with giving Korean cinema the domestic revenue base it needed to develop. The debate about whether it's still necessary is ongoing.

The New Korean Cinema (1990s–2000s)

Everything changed in the 1990s. The democratization of the late 1980s loosened censorship. A new generation of filmmakers trained in Korean universities and abroad arrived with different ambitions. The 영화진흥위원회 (Korean Film Council, KOFIC) was established in 1999 to support production, distribution, and international marketing.

박찬욱 (Park Chan-wook)'s 올드보이 (Oldboy, 2003) winning the Cannes Grand Prix was the international announcement. But the domestic story had been building for years before that:

• 쉬리 (Shiri, 1999) — an action thriller about North Korean sleeper agents; the first Korean film to outgross Hollywood blockbusters at the Korean domestic box office

• 공동경비구역 JSA (Joint Security Area, 2000) — 박찬욱; about soldiers on the 비무장지대 (DMZ)

• 살인의 추억 (Memories of Murder, 2003) — 봉준호; based on Korea's first documented serial murder case

• 장화, 홍련 (A Tale of Two Sisters, 2003) — 김지운 (Kim Jee-woon); horror; first Korean film to receive a wide US theatrical release

This decade produced the directors, the industry infrastructure, and the international relationships that made the subsequent global breakthrough possible.

The Commercial Peak and Festival Success (2000s–2010s)

Korean cinema in the 2000s and 2010s achieved a remarkable balance: consistent domestic blockbusters and international festival presence simultaneously.

Domestic blockbusters:

• 괴물 (The Host, 2006) — 봉준호; monster film as social commentary; 13 million domestic admissions

• 변호인 (The Attorney, 2013) — based on 노무현 (Roh Moo-hyun)'s early career; 11 million admissions

• 국제시장 (Ode to My Father, 2014) — Korean War through family drama; 14 million admissions

• 명량 (The Admiral: Roaring Currents, 2014) — the highest-grossing Korean film of its era; 17.6 million admissions

Festival presence:
박찬욱 at Cannes (올드보이, 아가씨 The Handmaiden). 이창동 (Lee Chang-dong) at Venice and Cannes (시 Poetry, 버닝 Burning). 봉준호 building toward 기생충. Korean cinema was a regular presence at the world's major festivals long before a general audience was paying attention.

The Global Moment (2019–Present)

기생충 (Parasite, 2019) is the inflection point that non-Korean audiences know. But the industry context matters: 기생충 didn't come from nowhere. It was the product of three decades of investment, craft development, and infrastructure-building.

What 기생충 did was make it undeniable to audiences and industries that had been looking the other way. After the Palme d'Or at Cannes 2019 and the Academy Awards sweep in 2020, the perception of Korean cinema globally changed — not the cinema itself, which had been operating at this level for years.

In 2026, 왕과 사는 남자 (The Man Living with the King) — a 조선 (Joseon)-era historical drama about the exiled king 단종 (Danjong) — surpassed 명량's box office record to become the highest-grossing Korean film by total revenue, confirming that the domestic audience for ambitious Korean cinema is larger than ever.

Why Korean Cinema Is What It Is

장르 as container for social commentary. Korean filmmakers have consistently used genre conventions — horror, thriller, monster film — to carry social and political content. This produces films that work on multiple levels simultaneously: entertaining as genre, resonant as social observation.

Historical weight. A century of 일제강점기 (Japanese colonial rule), war, division, military dictatorship, and rapid industrialization gives Korean storytelling material that is inherently dramatic.

State support with creative independence. 영화진흥위원회 (KOFIC)'s structure provides financial support for Korean film production without the ideological controls of the earlier period.

Audience sophistication. Korean domestic audiences support ambitious, difficult films in numbers that Western markets rarely see. A director like 이창동 — whose films are challenging, slow, and emotionally demanding — can achieve mainstream theatrical releases in Korea. That financial foundation enables the work to exist.

Summary

Next up: Where and How to Watch Korean Films Legally →